Feedback on the questions for testing

I don't have the file with all the questions, but have a look through them when you get it from Dann and then you can read through some of the comments and discussion I had with Sofia below.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Is it stated in the testing analyze that we are doing the immersion test according to attention. Many questions are directed to attention of different sorts. Does attention to detail = immersion. So all the interactive users are more immersed since they have access to more detail and can say more?

Try to do a semi pilot on a know movie to get some multiple choice questions.

See what different answers someone could give on the questions we've made. Eg. on the question of "What is Peter's objective?" People could say complete different things or even ask who is Peter. How can these answers be categorized then with so few test participants.

Good idea with having the paper plane or alike happening in the background while the participant is watching the movie. Have that as the first question in the interview, about if they saw something else happening around them while watching, such as the making of the paper plane. But don't lead them to the answer.Then ask if the movie fulfilled their expectations so we know their background.

Look into the question about if they thought there were any missing elements... try to lead them in to those things, were they forgiving on places were they could have been thrown off track?

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

This were the main things we talked about. I'll tell u more when we meet up tomorrow!