Feedback on the questions for testing

I don't have the file with all the questions, but have a look through them when you get it from Dann and then you can read through some of the comments and discussion I had with Sofia below.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Is it stated in the testing analyze that we are doing the immersion test according to attention. Many questions are directed to attention of different sorts. Does attention to detail = immersion. So all the interactive users are more immersed since they have access to more detail and can say more?

Try to do a semi pilot on a know movie to get some multiple choice questions.

See what different answers someone could give on the questions we've made. Eg. on the question of "What is Peter's objective?" People could say complete different things or even ask who is Peter. How can these answers be categorized then with so few test participants.

Good idea with having the paper plane or alike happening in the background while the participant is watching the movie. Have that as the first question in the interview, about if they saw something else happening around them while watching, such as the making of the paper plane. But don't lead them to the answer.Then ask if the movie fulfilled their expectations so we know their background.

Look into the question about if they thought there were any missing elements... try to lead them in to those things, were they forgiving on places were they could have been thrown off track?

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

This were the main things we talked about. I'll tell u more when we meet up tomorrow!

Things to do before the test

Interactive material:

- Retouched climbers photograph of the water creature

- Photographs of the Ningen

- Map
- Show the lake from a google earth view (better than danns?)

- Short news paper article
- Describing the mountain climbers comments and something about the Ningen legend

AAARRRGGGGGGGG

I am NOT liking tracking................

supervisor meeting 29.04.2009

- A bit low of references ... pre-analyses.

- argue pretty well about interactivity .... and that work well

- we need a reason why we are doing this ....

- we need to connect the these part together .. immersion and interactivity

- the motivation part is missing...... introduction ....

-The reasoning MISSING. why should the reader be interested in this.

-rap each section up what we are looking at.

- for the interaction part,,, what does this project give to the user, comparing to the others projects that have been done...

- introduction

interactive movies, immersion, narratology

- WHY DO WE NEED THIS::::::::: WHY IS THIS INTERACTIVE IMMERSION MOVIE NEEDE

-Start with Why we are doing this in the introduction.

- easter egg in matrix... DANN

- send soffia what we have on friday ...

- immersion and interactivity .... are they to short .... are they understandable ... don´t make the impression that we only read 2 books .... remember references ...

- see saw the problem statement ... and her comment was do you really want to test all the aspects of narrative immersion .....???????????

- need to find out how to test the emotional, spacial, and temporal immersion, how is this going to be affected ....

-limit the problem statement to LIMITED TIME......

-reachers ....for a location to test ...people that are interested or can spend 30 min .